Keep calling a harassing me about a debt with MDG which I don’t know anything about

thanks apreciate the message being burnt twice by these scumbags garbage equipment ... with extras i never gave permission to ..

I got an email from Michelle Smit from Stephen Walters Professional Corporation, the address that she provided me leads to a BMA Management Consultants, same address and suite number but different phone numbers.

Michelle called me twice, anyone know what she does/wants??Thanks!

Do not pay. They will send you steve Walters letters. Still do not pay. Total scam!

I recieved a message from (905) 296-3537 this afternoon....I am in Newfoundland....The lady said she was calling from Steven Walters law office...She said her name was ROSANNE..not Michelle this time..She gave to indication as to what the call was comcerning...I have never dealt with a law office in my life...freaked me out just a little

Not Michelle and I did get served thank you and I owed a debt.....The judge granted the judgment and now im stuck getting my wage garnished....dont associate Steven Walters or Michelle to me I am just as angry but didnt want to see anyone else get hurt as I did get over yourself

okay guys this is how to handle micheal smit , call claudtte at (905) 296-3647 she is the customer complants at the steven walters law office let her know what micheal is doing include all other information you can supply on voice mail or directly to her , micheal is a lawyer at steven walters law office you can also lay a complant with the upper law society of Ontario her actions are misleading , threating and harassing stand up for yourself you can also follow threw with laying a complaint with the police department in your region

hello i have been to small claims court and you have to served with proper papers and it cannot happen in another province..the law firm has to take the matter to you...in your area....who every Angry is is wrong ...also garnish of wages is depended on employer if he/or she wants to garnish your pay cheque . If they dont have to garnish  and most dont.....other wise all creditors can take this route its to costly and time consuming which is why more don't  unless its a large amount....i think Angry is probably Michelle or Rose from the Stephen Law office...