All very Horatio Alger, eh?

Excuse me, I'll be right back, I just threw up a little....

I can say without hesitation that I have never had any question about whether or not I should do business with the geniuses at Primerica.  But then, I follow the business news pretty closely....

I got a call last wednesday...and what i really don't understand is...when i asked  the gentleman who called me where he got my information...he couldn't give me a tangible answer as to where...that to me made me think.

I will not mind going for the interview...but at the moment my instincts says not to go...and besides...this company have tried numerous times to recruit me after school and have turned them down...Anways...guys stop arguing...this Tal Grossman is enjoy some stake and some wine not even remember who he hired yesterday...

I got a call last wednesday...and what i really don't understand is...when i asked  the gentleman who called me where he got my information...he couldn't give me a tangible answer as to where...that to me made me think.I will not mind going for the interview...but at the moment my instincts says not to go...and besides...this company have tried numerous times to recruit me after school and have turned them down...Anways...guys stop arguing...this Tal Grossman is enjoy some stake and some wine not even remember who he hired yesterday...

After seeing the list of CMA sponsors on their website, I question the point of checking with the CMA.  Here is the quote from their website that matters: "CMA is a private trade association funded by its members."  The CMA isn't out there to promote good.  It's out there to promote the sponsors' interests.  Strawberry said, "If not listed, ask yourself why?"  Shall I raise suspicion to the tens of thousands of other companies, then?  How about asking why there are only 20 sponsors to the entire organization, and why they are bothering with funding the CMA?  Whatever may be said about MLMs and Primerica, I question Strawberry's judgement.

I was in Primerica for 15 years. Without telling all the details of my time in that company. It was my bread and butter. I made my living, but I admit to make money in Primerica you have to be able to sacrifice a lot of people who will fail.  Just like you I have learned money concepts that I think are good concept, but after  15 years in the business I can say that those concept don't work. It did not work for me and my family and it did not work for any of my 1,000 plus clients. All I did for them is provided them a very expensive term insurance and have them open an IRA. Good concept but they can do better somewhere else. I'm glad I finally decided to get out. Please learn the concept and then look at the numbers. PRI is public company, try to make your research and not stick solely to what they say. Primerica is good and so a lot of companies. Please don't be like me before. I became a hater of other companies and their agents just because they don't hold the PRI concept. And I have lost a lot of friends. Most people are good even they do not work for Primerica.Here's a recent public news: money.msn.com on PRI

Mr. Anchetta, I just received your email (attached below). I take it you decline my offer to explain your side of the story and prefer to blackmail...

Received via feedback:
***
"We have about 45 agents that will be continuosly posting information about the validity of WhoCallsMe on anti-WhoCallsMe forums.  I've already asked numberous times for you to remove information that is invalid - from individuals who we haven't contacted.  This is not a large request - you have been daily removing my posts and some Pro-Primerica posts from this page.  By mid week we will start our aggressive campaign to challenge the validity of WhoCallsMe.  We have a lot of information, and have accumulated over the past 2 weeks phone numbers of individuals from your team.  Again - ALL I'M ASKING FOR IS FOR POSTS FROM PEOPLE THAT WE DID NOT CALL TO BE REMOVED.  We want nothing else.  

Thank You for your understanding
Ray Anchetta"
***

You will be challenging the validity of WhoCallsMe? This is not Britannica, if you have not noticed, it's a USER SUPPLIED reverse phone number lookup database. There's bound to be discrepancies and incorrect information. It's up to the end user of that information to make conclusions based on the available data.

You will be challenging the anonymous posters? If yes, why not here? Please, again, tell us why the posters are wrong? We do want to hear your side of the story. I am not against you, Mr. Anchetta, even though you are making it difficult for me to stay objective.

Also, I NEVER removed Pro-Primerica posts from this page. I removed spam, which included positive AND negative comments.