This is the best thing I've ever done in my life.  First of all, never let things you read on the internet effect your choices or decisions - get the info first hand, secondly - Michael's web direction is good - but when I researches the company in the library, I came across a book called "The ABC's of Making Money"  This book is an international best seller and talks about how strong this company truly is.  I'm part of a great team that has people who truly care.  Good luck to all those fortunate enough to get a call for a chance!!

Yep. Primerica almost got me a few years ago with it's insurance MLM. Did a little digging and found that the people who didn't get poorer but wiser and leave quickly got trapped into a cultlike cycle of trying to recruit new members and exhausting themselves traveling to as many customers as possible, living in bunkhouse conditions, and never getting ahead. Every once in a while someone would break through and make a couple dollars, and it was a quasi-religious faith that they would be next that kept the drones going.

Shortcake clearly didn't understand the link. The CMA was set up by telemarketers to create an ethics code for telemarketers who join to follow. It seems the telemarketer in question has questionable ethics according to these posts.As far as MLM goes, in Canada, "An MLM plan is a plan with three or more levels (the operator and at least two levels of participants) that promotes the supply of a product to participants of the plan. Compensation is earned by participants in the MLM plan based on the supply of the product to participants and/or non-participants of the MLM plan. A legitimate MLM plan focuses on the supply of products rather than the recruitment of prospective participants into the MLM plan and offers products that consumers value and are willing to purchase."http://competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/03035.html#multi_levelI think people can decide for themselves based on this description whether a particular company is MLM or not.

Mr. Anchetta, I just received your email (attached below). I take it you decline my offer to explain your side of the story and prefer to blackmail... Received via feedback:***"We have about 45 agents that will be continuosly posting information about the validity of WhoCallsMe on anti-WhoCallsMe forums.  I've already asked numberous times for you to remove information that is invalid - from individuals who we haven't contacted.  This is not a large request - you have been daily removing my posts and some Pro-Primerica posts from this page.  By mid week we will start our aggressive campaign to challenge the validity of WhoCallsMe.  We have a lot of information, and have accumulated over the past 2 weeks phone numbers of individuals from your team.  Again - ALL I'M ASKING FOR IS FOR POSTS FROM PEOPLE THAT WE DID NOT CALL TO BE REMOVED.  We want nothing else.  Thank You for your understandingRay Anchetta"***You will be challenging the validity of WhoCallsMe? This is not Britannica, if you have not noticed, it's a USER SUPPLIED reverse phone number lookup database. There's bound to be discrepancies and incorrect information. It's up to the end user of that information to make conclusions based on the available data. You will be challenging the anonymous posters? If yes, why not here? Please, again, tell us why the posters are wrong? We do want to hear your side of the story. I am not against you, Mr. Anchetta, even though you are making it difficult for me to stay objective. Also, I NEVER removed Pro-Primerica posts from this page. I removed spam, which included positive AND negative comments.

This Primerica bottom feeder has been phoning and bothering me trying to get me to pay fees and join this scam.  Thanks for all the useful information here.

I got a phone call today from JC after I referred to his name I found he is from Primerica.  I have spent alot of money on Primerica with another firm.  Just to join it was like 300.00 dollars and then writing tests and all it was way more than I expected.  I really hope this will stop.