Well it was the number stealing scam.  That address in Quebec they give doesn't exist on google maps...Called back tapped nine and it's owned by primus Canada. I've sent them an email asking to have my number removed from their list, well see what they say, however if they're aiding and abetting harrasing scam calls...

From the comments, this number must be a Skype VOIP/telephone gateway. Anyone could be calling.

Ok, here is what it is, I think. Oversea, especially in Asia, there is a service that you can get a free software from phone card provider to install on your computer. You can then use the software to place long distance calls after entering the pin number on the phone card onto the software. A $5 card can give you 1200 minutes to anywhere in the world. Each time I get a call from Asia using the above mentioned method, the number (604) 629-2009 shows up. I don't know why. Having said all that, the people oversea place the call, could easily press the wrong number so you guys'd get the call accidentally.

I got a call from this number...missed it...called it back it was showing up as network busy...called again and it went to a dial tone!

Asked for ken but i don't know who?

we received 2 telus (vancouver) phone numbers two months ago, and we have had been receiving about 15 nuisance calls both  day & night, with the persistant long beeps as mentioned above, and the calls are almost always labeled "unavailable name & number" on our call display. After numerous calls to Telus, we have been instructed to pay for call screen *60, activate anonymous call block *77, and that we add our number's to the national "Do not call list". This number (604) 629-2009 is the first identifiable number we've seen so far. We have had to turn our ringers off on the phones before we go to bed at night so we're not woken up anymore by these ridiculous & annoying nuisance calls. It's very frustrating but hopefully with all the telephone add-ons it will slowly come to a stop. I think Telus should be held responsible somehow for supplying numbers that may have been problem lines or I dont'really know, its just not acceptable.